Filed under: Politics
Something happened today that has me so enraged, it broke my admittedly pathetic silence in blogging. Without warrant I received an e-mail from President Barack Obama’s Senior Advisor, David Axelrod seeking to set the record straight on the Administration’s health care policy.
Funny thing is, I never asked to receive information from the President.
Uh, in the corporate world, that’s what we call spamming.
I was just spammed by the President of the United States.
What’s even more odd, is that the message was sent to my work address, which I most certainly never use for personal or political use.
I’ve already contacted the White House and I’m demanding to know…”Dear Mr. President, how did you get my e-mail and why are you spamming me?”
You know, I haven’t been too invested in this topic as of yet, but you better believe I will be now. I really hate to spread the propaganda machine further, but the full message I illegitimately received is below.
Burbadad
| Dear Friend,
This is probably one of the longest emails I’ve ever sent, but it could be the most important. Across the country we are seeing vigorous debate about health insurance reform. Unfortunately, some of the old tactics we know so well are back — even the viral emails that fly unchecked and under the radar, spreading all sorts of lies and distortions. As President Obama said at the town hall in New Hampshire, “where we do disagree, let’s disagree over things that are real, not these wild misrepresentations that bear no resemblance to anything that’s actually been proposed.” So let’s start a chain email of our own. At the end of my email, you’ll find a lot of information about health insurance reform, distilled into 8 ways reform provides security and stability to those with or without coverage, 8 common myths about reform and 8 reasons we need health insurance reform now. Right now, someone you know probably has a question about reform that could be answered by what’s below. So what are you waiting for? Forward this email. Thanks, David Axelrod P.S. We launched www.WhiteHouse.gov/realitycheckthis week to knock down the rumors and lies that are floating around the internet. You can find the information below, and much more, there. For example, we’ve just added a video of Nancy-Ann DeParle from our Health Reform Office tackling a viral email head on. Check it out: 8 ways reform provides security and stability to those with or without coverage
Learn more and get details: http://www.WhiteHouse.gov/health-insurance-consumer-protections/ 8 common myths about health insurance reform
Learn more and get details: 8 Reasons We Need Health Insurance Reform Now
|
||
Filed under: Politics | Tags: 2008, candidate, change, coke, election, new, obama, presidential
If the media has nailed public sentiment, then we Americans are seeking change. I know I’ve been intoxicated by the thought of being part of a radical history making change in our Presidential history. That, of course, manifesting itself in the first black man, Obama, to lead our country. As we get closer to the election; however, and the scrutiny intensifies, as much as I want that ultimate moment of fresh air to happen, I just don’t think Obama is the man. And here’s why.
Don’t be fooled by thinking that “change” is inherently good. Change for the sake of change can be more dangerous than the status quo. Change for the right reasons, at the right time, in the right form is what this country needs. I think of Obama as New Coke. “Wow, it would be cool to do something new and different.” “Check out the awesome packaging.” “Coca-Cola is great, so new coke must be sublime.”
But, then you pop the top and take a drink and it’s just not there. Sure, it’s a change, but it didn’t get us to a better place.
The fact of the matter is that his policies (particularly economy and war) are off and his experience isn’t there, yet. Yes, he’d bring change. But the wrong kind. At the wrong time. In the wrong form. He’s all packaging with no promise.
Filed under: Politics | Tags: abc, angles, bad, camera, convention, delegates, news, protester, random, republican, shots
I’m sure there is plenty of more worthwhile topics to comment on following last night’s Republican Convention speeches, but I just got too wrapped up in the art – or lack thereof – at ABC. Did anyone else notice that when they did the awkward cuts to the audience they found the most random things to show. Just a few examples: Palin’s speech on the teleprompter; someone’s butt as they were walking up the aisle; a protester being thrown out; random delegates paying no attention. I know, I should have just turned the channel, but I couldn’t wait for the next terrible shot to scoff at.
Disclaimer: I’m an undecided voter with serious reservations about both candidates.
Who cares that Palin’s daughter is going to make her a grandma in a few months? Sure, sure…she’s only 17, which stings a little, but c’mon that family has got “hottie” in the genes – just look at momma, er, grand-momma, that is! Are you really surprised? What else is there to do in cold Alaska?
The real issue emerging from this is whether or not she was properly vetted and did McCain’s camp act too quickly in choosing her. I think I actually like McCain more after this Jamie-Lynn Spears-ish revelation. I take his word that he was fully informed about the teenage pregnancy. I think he felt so passionately about this candidate being the right pick that he was willing to assume the risk in making her his running mate. And the more I hear from Palin, the more I can see why. To me, that shows that McCain is passionate, forgiving and a little risky. I like that. http://washingtontimes.com/news/2008/sep/02/mccain-says-palin-thoroughly-checked/





